Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khajuri Village


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Icewedge (talk) 17:57, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Khajuri Village

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

1.Unreferenced & non-verifiable content 2.Too-short article Quality check 12:13, 10 December 2008 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quality check (talk • contribs)
 * Delete. No references, no evidence of notability. Luinfana (talk) 13:39, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  16:01, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Named inhabited places have been considered notable for quite some time. Census data shows 159 inhabitants. Information is verifiable in gsearch. Article needs editing and expanding, not deletion.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  16:06, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - per Fabrictramp. I have added a stub template to the article, which should deal with the length concern. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 18:23, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per Frabrictramp. The nominator appears to have being verified and being verifiability mixed up. - Mgm|(talk) 18:55, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as per everyone but the nominator. Edward321 (talk) 23:23, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - inhabited settlements are notable. TerriersFan (talk) 01:04, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Just to be clear, I did not nominate this article. I'm not sure who did - Quality Control, perhaps? It's not signed correctly.Luinfana (talk) 01:07, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * User:Quality check nominated the article for deletion.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  01:11, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable per above and SNOW. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 00:57, 13 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.