Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khaldoun Almhanna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  09:06, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Khaldoun Almhanna

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A promotional article on a physician who meets neither the GNG nor WP:PROF. Possibly even speedy delete, since the biographical part of the article is in large part a very close paraphrase of his bio at Moffit Cancer Center here, and this is an entirely promotional article that would need extensive rewriting beyond normal editing, even if he were notable. But he doesn't meet the GNG--there are no references providing significant coverage in independent reliable sources. He doesn't meet WP:PROF: the publication record shows only 10 papers with citation counts of 10 or more, which is trivial in a heavily cited field like oncology. He is not  a full professor, or even an associate professor. He has not been on the editorial board of any journal, and just reviewing papers for a journal is trivial. He is an officer in no national professional association, he is an elected fellow of no professional society,just an ordinary member. His awards are trivial awards within his own state, not the national level awards that show notability

And the author of this article appears to be an entirely promotional editor writing articles about physicians at the Moffit Cancer Center, see WP:Articles for Deletion/ -.  DGG ( talk ) 05:38, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:21, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:21, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:21, 7 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom's clear reasons. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:37, 7 September 2013 (UTC).
 * Delete per the several reasons given in the nomination, especially the apparent COI of this editor.  Lesion  ( talk ) 14:59, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * struck comment because ... it's too complicated to explain. Lesion  ( talk ) 23:28, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of evidence of passing either WP:PROF or WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:06, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.