Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khaled Boushaki


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:02, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Khaled Boushaki

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY. Creator, who has a lot of edits on various Algeria-related topics, added a ton of references, which don't seem to get close to GNG. Player spent his entire career in low divisions, it looks like. BlameRuiner (talk) 15:47, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:01, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Algeria-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:04, 8 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. To confirm, he hasn't played in any of the top 2 divisions in Algeria (which are fully-pro), so at most in 3rd division. Nehme1499 16:17, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 16:47, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails GNG. Bebopjohnson (talk) 16:55, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - this Q&A has some decent coverage but I couldn't see anything else, although it's still more than you would generally expect for a player and coach at this level. The Blogspot one looks like a Wikipedia mirror and is unreliable anyway. He also hasn't played at a level that would give him presumed notability so I feel that deletion is the only option here but the user has clearly put a lot of effort into creating this; it's just a shame that almost every source is just a trivial mention. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:26, 9 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.