Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khalid Aziz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 22:54, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Khalid Aziz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sources to support claims in this article, article possibly written by the subject itself, regardless of the claims - do not think they are reliable and subject is not notable, cannot find many sources on the internet about this particular subject of this article, the only link is a link to the subject's own personal company, there are only two references in this article: one that does not say anything about the subject and the other links to one article that only briefly mentions him but does not support the claims of this article Sheroddy (talk) 14:32, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 14:37, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 24 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete unless it can actually be improved as my searches found nothing convincingly good and there was certainly enough for this article to improve since October 2004 and with that it has always been affected by promotionalism (whether intended or not and the first Oct. 2004 version actually had his contact details making it read even more like a personal page). SwisterTwister   talk  05:28, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not LinkedIn, and it's not a place to raise funds for charities, the info seems to be largely true, though, according to this Kraxler (talk) 01:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't meet standards for notability. Seems more like an advertisement than an encyclopedic article. Fuzchia (talk) 20:14, 26 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.