Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khalid Aziz (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not reaching for the WP:SALT yet, but if it comes back again it'll be time to empty the shaker. The Bushranger One ping only 08:06, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Khalid Aziz
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. Repeatedly recreated page; was previously deleted in Aug 2015.  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  16:05, 16 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - no independent in-depth coverage, just standard job profiles and self-provided PR information (ref #6 for example). Clearly written to promote the topic. A successful career isn't automatically "notability" (in Wikipedia's sense of the term) without significant coverage in independent sources. GermanJoe (talk) 18:20, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as I somewhat remember this AfD from August and it seems more or less the exact state so there's nothing to suggest a better article, nearly even G4 material. SwisterTwister   talk  06:12, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Per the previous AFD and WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO - I cannot locate reliable sources that satisfy the requirement for significant coverage, let alone the requirement for anything beyond basic coverage - there isn't any sources that seem to cover this person in-depth.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   10:36, 17 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Do Not Delete - The information is true and can be proven through the linked sources Phoebe.Ashley (talk) 14:07, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. We don't have evidence of passing WP:PROF nor WP:GNG: the only references that look reliable and about the actual subject of the article (rather than merely about TV shows he's associated with) are a local news story about him stepping down from a charity, with little detail about him, and the Debrett's profile. I don't think that's enough. The FRSA is certainly not enough (it's too unselective). The username history of the article's promoters strongly hints that the article was created as part of a paid promotional campaign. And the failure to respect the previous AfD outcome suggests that we need to protect this against continued re-creation. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:12, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above, Fails WP:GNG .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:33, 23 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.