Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khalid Butt (Bahawalpur cricketer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No current target for proposed redirect, can be added at editor discretion if/when it is created. Daniel (talk) 23:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Khalid Butt (Bahawalpur cricketer)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm  (talk)  13:09, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment, which Urdu-language resources did the nominator search before determining that there was no reliable sources? Hack (talk) 14:40, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Does that mean you have found some? wjematherplease leave a message... 21:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 17:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Bahawalpur cricketers or similar Has played 2 FC matches, but I couldn't find any coverage. Using a similar precedent to that used by WP:FOOTY where players with one of a few matches but no coverage, are deleted/redirected. If any Urdu coverage can be found, please ping me and i'll reconsider. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 20:15, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Articles are kept only when people can proactively identify sources, we do not keep articles because of some empty assertion that sources might exist someone.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - only trivially passes NCRIC and there is no evidence of any significant coverage; no redirect target exists Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:57, 5 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.