Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khalid Rashid Ali Al-Murri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No prejudice to the creation of a redirect to an appropriate article. Mkativerata (talk) 19:30, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Khalid Rashid Ali Al-Murri

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:BIO, no multiple reliable independent sources who give indepth information about this person. The OARDEC dcouments and other givernments are primary sources, and other sources just mention him as one of a list of detainees. Problems tagged for over a year. Looking for different versions of his name didn't return more results. Fram (talk) 15:28, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Falls far short of WP:BIO due to the lack of coverage in secondary sources, and any secondary sourcing that may be found will not establish anything more then a WP:BLP1E.-- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 15:35, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete The wikignome in me is impressed: the article is so well-documented that it hurts to vote for deletion. And this person certainly belongs on any Wikipedia list of GITMO detainees.  Finally, it's definitely a notable tragedy that a number of people of no real consequence were detained for so long.  But it's not Wikipedia's job as a repository of biographies of notable people to have a bio of GITMO detainee who was determined by some process of law to be not notable at all, much less notable for being a terrorist. Maybe it would be best to userfy this article and recycle its excellent citations into some relevant article. Yakushima (talk) 15:59, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - The subject is not notable. Being a Detaines in GTMO is not enough.  No reliable independent sources for this subject, as indicated above.--Yachtsman1 (talk) 22:58, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Guantanamo Bay detainment camp-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  —Anotherclown (talk) 06:53, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - relies mainly on primary documents and lacks "significant independent coverage". Therefore it is non-notable per WP:GNG. Anotherclown (talk) 06:53, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: per Brewcrewer's reasoning. I think it would be okay to include the name on a list of detainees, but it is probably excessive for a biography in this case. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:49, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.