Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khan Habibullah Khan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep, nomination withdrawn. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 05:39, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Khan Habibullah Khan
Aparently fails the tests of WP:BIO, WP:RS, and WP:V,-- Marwatt 17:28, 10 September 2006 (UTC) Comment This dosen't mean that we have to deletethe article of Acting President, First Senate Chairman, Minister, Chief Justcie, Member Assembly and the one who has the honour to flew glag on his carand in his residence and office for 30 consecutive years. Now if your father dosen't have such honour what can I do? Why to delete this article, I affirm there should be some changes. But as I started the article, let me tell you, it will take some time in upgrading this article. Contribute here, please, instead of requesting deletion for the articles related to personals related to Khan Habibullah Khan. Let me remind you, that yourself mentioned at one spot on wikipedia about the importance of this man. Now what happened?


 * Keep Even I've heard of this certainly notable fellow - he's certainly notable, and if you look at my contributions when I did a bit a of random articling I'm quite the deletionist.84.9.83.105 01:23, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Pardon me for being ignorant but did you mention any source or I just read the word "heard"? -- Marwatt 01:43, 11 September 2006 (UTC)


 * "Not Hard Marwatt it is not hard to getthe articles and information about a Minister, Senate Chairman, President, Chief Justice and much more.

Marwatt, you are from the same tribe of whom Khan Habibullah Khan is,isn't it so? So you yourself know that who is he and who he isn't. Come on don't become negative, even having personalenimity with his family.

Keep Strong Request." — Preceding unsigned comment added by A M. Khan (talk • contribs) 08:57, 11 September 2006
 * Comment: incorrectly submitted. Now inserted on Articles for deletion/Log/2006 September 11 The JPS talk to me  19:30, 11 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment. Is there a "Who's Who in Pakistan" or a "Who Was Who in Pakistan" book which could be used to confirm the biographical details of various politicians, government officials and businesspeople who might be notable? Such a reference book would save a lot of discussion time in AfD. Perhaps someone with access to a university library could check. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 21:14, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. The name of "Who's Who" is public domain, and some are vanity publications, and may not be reliable. Ohconfucius 03:26, 12 September 2006 (UTC)


 *  Weak Keep. This page and its accompanying AFD are both awful messes, but as far as I can tell (not knowing the precise ins and outs of Pakistani politics) he seems to have been a notable governmental figure, See here and here (highlighted from google's cache for ease of reading). Needs verifiability and references on most of the points in the article though. Irongargoyle 00:15, 12 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - Seems to be an important figure.Bakaman Bakatalk 02:21, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. He was a well known figure of Southern N.W.F.P. for sure. However, the problem with this article is that the author tries to insert certain assumptions which can be claimed by any one because its hard to find references for them. I am otherwise O.K. with this entry if those irrelevant details are removed from the article. -- Nigar 03:41, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The article as written is incoherent and tells nothing at all. Allon FambrizziAllon Fambrizzi
 * Keep and cleanup. The subject meets WP:BIO (thanks to Irongargoyle) as a member of a provincial assembly, in both pre-independence India and in Pakistan. If there aren't good sources in a library then the edited article won't be very long, but that's not sufficient reason for deletion. Mereda 06:52, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. Requires a cleaning (as per Mereda ) and removel of excessive salutations. --Aiditor 23:03, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. I have completely re-written and tagged the page with: expert. Irongargoyle 00:29, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Thanks to Irongargoyle I would like to take back my nomination of Delete (provided the article remains free of absurdities added by anonymous editors). -- Marwatt 02:31, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep following withdrawal of nomination. Note that national legislators are considered notable automatically, so this article should never have been brought here in the first place. Hornplease 23:47, 14 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.