Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khan Sir

Khan Sir

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This stub about an Internet personality whose channel is education based was recently accepted at AFC. I believe it to be a borderline acceptance, which is fine of itself. AFC reviewers role is to accept drafts which they believe have a better than 50% chance of surviving an immediate deletion process. As a fellow AFC reviewer I believe that the subject is not verified to pass WP:BIO, and that the draft was below the acceptance threshold. On that basis I would not have accepted it. The referencing is independent, yes, but the content of the references is gossip column-like trivia, which simulates significant coverage, but which is not. I see the only way of resolving this is for the community to discuss it, hence AfD 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:36, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Education, Internet,  and India. 🇺🇦  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:36, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: I am not going to vote here since my stance is clear, as I accepted the draft. At the time I saw the draft, it was not passing GNG, but I know the personality well and thought he might already have a Wikipedia article. When I found out he did not, I started to find significant coverages and added many that are currently cited. I respect Timtrent’s judgment, and we already discussed it on my talk page. We would like to get the community's views on the article. Lastly, I want to add that if the article can’t be kept, we can draftify it, as it has good sourcing, and the subject may gain more coverage to establish notability in the future. Happy editing. Grab Up  -  Talk  13:58, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: Draftification is a perfectly acceptable outcome to me as nominator. I ought to have said that in the nomination. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:38, 11 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep per WP:DONOTDEMOLISH - Subject has a reasonable claim to notability, and I don't see what draftifying would accomplish.   ~Politicdude (About me, talk, contribs) 18:30, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –&#8239;Joe (talk) 17:17, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have done some research to find Hindi sources and interestingly found many that may establish notability. *BBC Hindi | *News18 Hindi | *NewsNation | *AmarUjala | *News18 Hindi and *Dainik Jagran Hindi In my opinion, the BBC Hindi one is a very powerful source with significant coverage. I will leave it to the community. Thanks. Grab Up  -  Talk  08:14, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I think its the time for voting Keep.  Grab Up  -  Talk  08:22, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete : I can only find coverage about "criminal" activities, , but they don't seem notable and rather tabloidey... I don't find coverage of his streaming career, so there just isn't enough for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 23:14, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * @Oaktree b: Hey, can you comment on these Hindi sources I mentioned above, especially BBC Hindi? Grab Up  -  Talk  00:43, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak keep The BBC source translates fine, seems like substantial coverage. With the rest of them, should be ok for notability.Vote amended above. Oaktree b (talk) 22:58, 19 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep - The BBC source says, to me at least, that the subject of the article does indeed pass WP:BIO. We have plenty of articles on internet educators, and this person is plenty notable in India. —  That Coptic Guy ping me! (talk) (contribs) 03:58, 20 July 2024 (UTC)