Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khan v. Bush


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. This is really a dispute over the application of MOS to these pages, and the blunt instrument deletion is ill-suited to such cases. No consensus reached in this discussion. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  17:03, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Khan v. Bush

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Disambiguation page should have atleast more than two blue links. This one has only one blue link, and that too a redirect, so having a disambiguation page doesn't makes sense. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 16:47, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, but not because of the number of blue/redlinks. WP:MOSDABRL has no objection to legitimate redlinks, but these are all minor cases unlikely to ever get their own articles. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:15, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Keep several entries, all meeting MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION. Valid entries. Boleyn (talk) 11:02, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Please tell that how do they meet the guidelines. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 11:07, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Comment per MOS:DABRL, has red link with incoming links (click on link, then 'What links here'). Per MOS:DABMENTION: If a topic does not have an article of its own, but is mentioned within another article, then a link to that article should be included. Boleyn (talk) 11:12, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Please try to understand that all the red links are unlikely to have a article. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 11:50, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Comment that may well turn out to be the case, I don't know, but it isn't relevant for it to be a valid entry, per MOS:DABMENTION. Boleyn (talk) 12:35, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. WP:MOSDABRL states "Do not create red links to articles that are unlikely ever to be written". Clarityfiend (talk) 04:10, 24 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Procedural closure This is one of a set of eight nominations today for disambig pages, five of which have already been withdrawn by the nominator.
 * Shoaib Khan (disambiguation)     June 23, 2012
 * Camp Echo (disambiguation)       June 23, 2012
 * Keiler (disambiguation)          June 23, 2012
 * Gholam Faruq (disambiguation)    June 23, 2012
 * Padshah (disambiguation)         June 23, 2012   Not closed yet
 * Daud Shah (disambiguation)       June 23, 2012
 * Rustam Akhmyarov (disambiguation) June 23, 2012  Not closed yet
 * Khan v. Bush                     June 22, 2012   Not closed yet
 * Unscintillating (talk) 17:12, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 01:48, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.