Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khanar Barakel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Belongs at Wookieepedia if anywhere. WjBscribe 00:29, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Khanar Barakel

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Entirely unreferenced article, nearly all Google hits are Wikipedia mirrors. Also, this suggests that this article is essentially fan fiction rather than a character from Star Wars canon. JavaTenor 10:41, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Depends partly on whether "the Star Wars Roleplaying Game" mentioned in the article, is one widely-known game whose scenario is widely known, or one of many independent Star Wars role-playing games. Anthony Appleyard 12:03, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * For clarification, it's my assertion that this is an article about a player character in some roleplaying game, which is obviously an inappropriate subject for Wikipedia. I'd welcome any evidence to the contrary, howerver. JavaTenor 17:48, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless out-of-universe information is provided to show that this character is more than something made up while playing an RPG one day. EALacey 16:35, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Totally Non-Notable.  Unreferenced: no external references, Yahoo!  and Google  searches produce only Wiki-mirror sites and maybe a forum blog page or two - nothing as a reliable primary source.  No external commentaries, no critical review, nothing to indicate that it represents anything beyond what someone made up in school one day (or in his room in his RPG).  The character appears to exist only in the creating user's mind and in his game.  Is there any verifiable information to the contrary?  I don't see any.  Move to an Uncyclopedia if anything. --T-dot (Talk | contribs) 16:25, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.