Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khanda Jhokmok


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  00:36, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Khanda Jhokmok

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Very few references, and the person is only mentioned in a list of other hundreds of disciples. No sign of independent notability. Jaunpurzada (talk) 14:35, 26 April 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bangladesh, India and Islam. --Jaunpurzada (talk) 19:11, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2023 May 1.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 19:29, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete All the district webpage says about Jhokmok is that his shrine is one of 16 noteworthy ones in the district. This only partly supports the first sentence of the article. All Ismail says about him is, "other Sufi Saints who propagated Islam in Sylhet are as follows: [list of 43 names, including Hazrat Jhanda Jhakmak] ... The dargah of Hazrat Jhanda Jhakmak is in Raipur of Sylhet." This doesn't support the second or third sentences of the article, and only partly supports the fourth. The district gazetteer merely lists his name among 355 "other Muslim Missionaries". This completely fails to verify the fifth sentence of the article. Azraf doesn't seem to add anything new. That leaves only p. 92 of v. 6 of journal Patrika. I will not be able to consult it before this discussion closes, but based on the other sources I'm inclined to believe the nominator when they say it is only a passing mention, not significant coverage. --Worldbruce (talk) 05:34, 11 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.