Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khao Chang Puek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:45, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Khao Chang Puek

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unremarkable... hike? KDS4444 (talk) 12:05, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: Article title is misspelled. Try . --Paul_012 (talk) 11:28, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment, after removing a great deal of promo fluff, this seems to be an article about a mountain rather than a hike, and as such should be judged by WP:GEOLAND standards. No comment as yet whether it passes those standards. Antepenultimate (talk) 05:59, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep good work. In that case it would be notable according to WP:GEOLAND, based on what Google reveals, which is plenty of verifying Ghits. I have added it to Category:Mountains of Thailand and List of mountains in Thailand, where it was redlinked with a slightly different English spelling. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:48, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes and my addition to List of mountains in Thailand was reverted because the English article name doesn't correspond to an accepted transcription, which I guess is Royal Thai General System of Transcription. I've piped it, but be aware that this article may well need to be moved. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Also added as a piped link to Thong Pha Phum National Park; correct spelling clearly seems to be Khao Chang Phueak. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:32, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Minor point, but this is a case where it's probably better to go ahead and create a redirect instead of piping. --Paul_012 (talk) 20:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Even if considering only the tourism aspects of the hike, it has received heaps of coverage in Thai news sources, satisfying the GNG. --Paul_012 (talk) 08:03, 20 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.