Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kharahal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus that as a named location that has had its existence proved, notability is demonstrated under GEOLAND (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 10:03, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Kharahal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completing nomination on behalf of an IP editor, whose rationale highlighted this location as "not a notable place". No comment from me on the merits. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 14:09, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:22, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:22, 15 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. Notable, like other geographic features. I added this reference. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:28, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. This valley satisfies GEOLAND as a named natural feature. Coverage in GNews. James500 (talk) 07:05, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per eastmain addition of the ref. Passes GNG. Accesscrawl (talk) 12:31, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.