Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khari Willis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 19:27, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Khari Willis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:NCOLLATH John from Idegon (talk) 08:24, 29 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment - there were initially two "refs" attached to the article, both of which have been removed. One was simply a link to Google search results. The second  was used as a source for copy/pasted content - so was removed along with that content due to the copyright issue. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:43, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:59, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:59, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:59, 30 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Right now, not wiki worthy. Can always be recreated in future. Postcard Cathy (talk) 16:57, 1 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Unreferenced. As per Postcard Cathy the article can be recreated in the future. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 00:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is an instance of WP:TOOSOON.  The kid appears to have just graduated from high school last month and has not yet even begun his collegiate career.  His "notability" at this point is limited to his efforts a high school athlete, and as per WP:NHSPHSATH: "High school and pre-high school athletes are notable only if they have received, as individuals, substantial and prolonged coverage that is (1) independent of the subject and (2) clearly goes beyond WP:ROUTINE coverage."  I am not seeing the type of "substantial and prolonged coverage" required by the guideline. Cbl62 (talk) 05:29, 2 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.