Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khawina, California


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep per WP:OUTCOMES (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:31, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Khawina, California

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

It seems to be former Pomo settlement day on Wikipedia. As before, I find that this falls well short of notability. Tyrenon (talk) 20:47, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * What exactly is your issue with articles on former Pomo settlements? --Oakshade (talk) 05:37, 4 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:04, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep As I said at the Kaci-Badon discussion: "we have proof of its existence, and widespread consensus is that all actual communities are notable, even former ones." This is the same situation.  Nyttend (talk) 02:06, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Nyttend. Edward321 (talk) 12:30, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Nyttend. It was a real community and an historic one of a race that almost went extinct to boot. --Oakshade (talk) 02:01, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.