Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KheloIPL


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 01:10, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

KheloIPL

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable cricket game/website. Only sources cited are from the site itself and one from [www.iplmag.com iplmag.com], which doesn't really look that reliable (looks like a fan site). Very few google hits with which to establish notability:, and nothing on google news either:. Alexa ranking approaching 10 million. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 20:27, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.   —AllynJ (talk | contribs) 23:58, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete: The article has no reliable sources except for the official site and has an Alexa rank of 10 million. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 22:48, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not cite any references from any third-party sources (let alone reliable ones!). Stephen Turner (Talk) 09:02, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, it does cite one, it's just hidden as the reflist was botched. I've just fixed it to make this more clear to those paricipating, although I still believe that the third-party link isn't reliable enough. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 21:01, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that. You're referring to the iplmag reference? I hadn't seen it before, but it doesn't look like an independent source to me. Stephen Turner (Talk) 22:42, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:14, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable. Johnlp (talk) 19:55, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  treelo  radda  00:11, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:24, 29 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.