Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khidmat Guzar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify, which even the creator seems on board with. Given the circumstances around the creation, I'm going to salt this title to prevent it from coming back without AfC approval. AfC reviewers: consider this my OK for an unSALT when/if you deem this suitable for mainspace. Star  Mississippi  00:42, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Khidmat Guzar

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article was moved to draft as needing further sources and material as existing information didn't meet notability. Creator copied the article to create in mainspace and tagged the draft for deletion.

Article is not ready for main space. There is one article that's a decent source and it's an obvious pre-release promotional piece. The rest are terrible sources - passing mentions or basic landing pages
 * hdinpakistan.com - good source, decent in depth, pre-lease promotional piece
 * dramaonline.pk - basic landing page, supports this exists and episodes, but nothing in depth, nothing to help show notability
 * phupo.com - passing mention of prior projects, nothing in depth, nothing to help notability
 * thenews.com.pk - interview, passing mention in list of shows actor as done, nothing in depth, nothing to help notability
 * dramasplanet.com - feels like a scraper nothing, basic information on show, very poor quality source, nothing for notability

Redirect to A-Plus TV  Ravensfire  (talk) 22:31, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  Ravensfire  (talk) 22:31, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  Ravensfire  (talk) 22:31, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:39, 9 April 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: A little more participation would be nice here. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - The said references support the subject. Besides that there are other sources from International sites as well which are Independent i.e, source from Asia4Arab, Sunrise Radio. And as you say the subject is not notable, it has aired internationally. All the references in the article confirms the existense and provides information relating to subject varying from basic to in depth. What do you expect to be included as references of a TV series? Lillyput4455 (talk) 10:10, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * What would be really nice is to allow the article to go through the draft process and address concerns that are raised, rather than just impatiently moving it to main article space as you've done time and again, even with articles that have been rejected. There's no plot section, nothing to help readers understand what this show is about.  A reception section, showing that sources actually NOTICED the show would be extremely helpful.  Over half the sources are basic landing pages with no extra information. The dramasonline, dramasplanet, zee5 and asia4arabs are all basically the same information.  Yes, it's shown on a paid subscription site in a dubbed format.  WP:TVINTL.  Ravensfire  (talk) 15:06, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - Same reason as above. Lillyput4455 (talk) 20:14, 13 April 2022 (UTC) (striking duplicate vote Liz Read! Talk! 03:12, 15 April 2022 (UTC)}
 * Please don't !vote twice.  Ravensfire  (talk) 14:20, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment, I'd normally say drafity here, but given the history above I'd only be able to do that if the author committed to improving before moving to main space. In the absence of that, a delete seems fair. CT55555 (talk) 22:52, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Ok! I'll try to add more content and improve it. Thank you! Lillyput4455 (talk) 19:54, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I'd also like to see them commit to waiting for the article to be improved by an AFC approver, not just moved at their whim. That's what got us here in the first place.  Ravensfire  (talk) 13:48, 18 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.