Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khilafah.is


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to ISIL.  MBisanz  talk 01:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Khilafah.is

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

We wouldn't publish a page on an official ISIL website so I don't know why we have a page on a short lived amateur website that sounds like it was constructed or just knocked together by an individual who may have had little direct connection to the group. Wikipedia is not a directory even for defunct contents. GregKaye 14:28, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 May 11.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 14:44, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Neutral - The shutting down of this website seemed to receive some coverage in New Zealand and Iceland. Not sure I understand the noms assertion that "We wouldn't publish a page on an official ISIL website". If it was notable, why wouldn't we? NickCT (talk) 15:03, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge to article about ISIL under "Propaganda and social media" section. Like NickCT I don't agree with the nominator's rationale, but the website doesn't meet the WP:GNG for its own article. —Мандичка YO 😜 15:40, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 00:22, 18 May 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 13:56, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.