Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khimera


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus was to keep the page but restore the original (software) version of the article, which I have done. If someone tries to revert it to the "gang" article, request page protection. MelanieN (talk) 18:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Khimera

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non notable street gang, none of the three sources listed even mention it Nohomersryan (talk) 19:42, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:12, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:12, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:12, 24 May 2016 (UTC)


 * I actually thought this could be hoax but then I see the article creator worked on another asian gang article that was legit. But it seems a whole lotta original research went into this. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:55, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete every word of the article may well be accurate, but the nominator is quite correct in that there is no notability here, at all, from what I can find. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:12, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment I wondered why this AfD was being flagged in WikiProject Computational Biology, but it looks like this page was on the Khimera software package, before it was completely overwritten in Sep 2015. As it turns out, I was the last person to edit before it was overwritten, see this edit from March 2013. The previous software article was not great, but I believe it is legit - whether the software package is itself noteworthy is a different question.... is it possible to include this AfD in the appropriate science discussions? The talk page suggests software/computing and chemistry, as well as computational biology. Thanks, --Amkilpatrick (talk) 15:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm sure I've gone about this the wrong way, but I've copied the last version of the software article and recreated it as Khimera (software), for now. I've also issued a 1st level warning to the editor who blanked this content. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks Shawn, I agree it's a messy situation. If the gang article consensus is to delete, I suggest we instead rollback to the software article so the history etc is preserved - if we're keeping both, then maybe we can split the gang article off as a new page? I notice from that users history that there are now redirects involved too, just to complicate things further! --Amkilpatrick (talk) 16:43, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, that was my concern, too. That the way I've done it wouldn't compromise the edit history. Note to closing admin please note that prior to user User:Ed.un's intervention, this article was a completely different article about software from 2009 to 2015. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:52, 24 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as this is apparently a somewhat newly founded gang within this decade but there's not a lot of information about the group itself so that's a questionable fact there, and then there's the fact there's nothing currently even minimally suggesting basic notability. Delete by far for now until a better article is available. SwisterTwister   talk  07:33, 30 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.