Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khin Thiri Thet Mon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 10:06, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Khin Thiri Thet Mon

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Lacks IMO WP:BIO, no sufficient secondary sources that are reliable AND intellectually independent of each other given after almost 3 days and lot of attention- Justice for Myanmar and The Irrawaddy seem to be mediums of activists. CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep According to these sources she is CEO and founder of her country's largest entertainment company 7th Sense Creation. I don't know what the nominator means by "no reliable sources" - The Irrawaddy is that country's second biggest media after The Myanmar Times and newly created the media Myanmar Now is amazing reliable per article. I've no idea for Justice for Myanmar source. I also saw your biased behavior in her talk page. Why do you putted AfD when that country is in nationalwide Internet shutdown? So because of the nationwide internet shutdown, the number of Burmese language editors is tiny. We should be slow to delete any of it. Thanks VocalIndia (talk) 13:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:09, 8 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep Both The Irrawaddy and Myanmar Now are major medias in our country and are reliable. Zin Win Hlaing (talk) 10:22, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , The Irrawaddy perhaps is a major media but far away from relaible - Citation: "publication produced by former Burmese activists who fled violent crackdowns on anti-military protests in 1988, it has always been closely associated with the pro-democracy movement" - nothing what I would call reliable here. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:28, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I admit, back in the days, The Irrawaddy was not an independent media, often acted like the Daily Mail, and did a ton of gossipping to generate sales and survive. But now, The Irrawaddy stands as independent media and a leading source of reliable news. Zin Win Hlaing (talk) 14:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep Notability of an individual is determined by being subject of coverage in reliable sources rather than what they had done; she is the founder of our country's top entertainment company and this person definitely passes WP:GNG on the sources provided in the articles alone. Also, notability is not inherited. A daughter of the head of state does not make her notable automatically, but she is notable in her own. I don't see how WP:NOTINHERITED applies here. Taung Tan (talk) 13:29, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep has a decent amount of RS coverage - article needs expansion, not deletion. Elliot321 (talk &#124; contribs) 19:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Has sufficient sourcing.  Zoozaz1   talk   04:05, 12 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.