Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khondokar Abdullah Zahangir


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:26, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Khondokar Abdullah Zahangir

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

All sources are routine coverages. Fails WP:GNG, WP:AUTHOR and WP:ACADEMIC. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 07:08, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 07:08, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 07:08, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 07:08, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 07:08, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 07:08, 23 January 2020 (UTC)


 * delete Routine coverage, reference from the group's website that he established, reference of his own books, news regarding the road accident etc seems WP:REFBOMB.~ Nahid Talk 14:17, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per above and because it was created by a user who evidently was here to promote some sort of Hindu-Muslim syncretism fringe theory and is now indefinitely blocked and topic banned from religion; his block was for a combination of disruptive editing, refusal to communicate, original research, edit warring, and, in the end, incompetence. -Crossroads- (talk) 17:13, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. I didn;t know we discriminated in notability as an author about whether the author's views were mainstream.  DGG ( talk ) 03:28, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay, to make the implicit explicit: the article's dubious pedigree, combined with the difficult-to-evaluate sources, suggests that WP:TNT is warranted. -Crossroads- (talk) 05:57, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Got some coverage from regional sources only when he died following an accident. Fails WP:GNG. Aman Kumar Goel(Talk) 15:47, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. He is a biggest islamic scholar in modern bangladesh. there should be issue regarding reference but this man should be in wikipedia. this is not the matter, what he promoted in his life. I don't understand why that question is arrived.   aakamal ( talk ) 12:18, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Please provide reliable sources for your claim and do understand that the AFD process is NOT ILIKEIT. Also, I fixed your signature. Best, ~ Nahid Talk 23:28, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply. As your request, I added so many reliable source in this article. I think That will be enough for it. ( Aakamal ) 09:50, 2 february 2020 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, those are not enough. Now it looks like WP:REFBOMB and all of them fail WP:RELIABLE. Lets talk about them: 3) VOA Bangla: subject was quoted in a piece, 8) Muslim Media: an Islamic website fails RS, 40) Daily star: report is about road accidents across the country. 41) abnews24: fails RS, also reported the road crash, 42) Prothom Alo: road crash report, 44) daily Inqilab and Sangram: road crash report but with details, first one is generally reliable but biased towards Islamic viewpoints, later is the Mouthpiece of Jamaat-e-Islami. 46) Janakantha: reports on discussion meeting in remembrance of the subject where he worked by university correspondent, 47) newsnextbd: fails RS and rest of them are e-commerce sites. ~ Nahid Talk 18:37, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 19:12, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete  Fails WP:GNG. Almost all of refs are from book selling site. others are routine coverage. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 18:30, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
 * First of all, there have so many referencs without book and news reference in this page. if you want to verify those, you can. secondly, death news can be reference. if you go there Xulhaz Mannan. 100% of reference are about death news. but no one is asking for deletation of this article. so, why for this page? ( Aakamal ) 03:14, 3 february 2020 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 20:57, 3 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per above. Fails WP:GNG. ~Moheen (keep talking) 07:52, 5 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.