Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khosrow Motazed Amoli


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:22, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Khosrow Motazed Amoli

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested WP:PROD. I have asked if this living person's could be transliterated into English differently. I note that the corresponding Persian Wikipedia article for this living person includes some controversy. For now, my !vote is neutral. Shirt58 (talk) 11:11, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Please do not remove the BLPPROD, refer to WP:BLPPROD for an explanation of why this is not removed until there are some reliable sources. --Fæ (talk) 11:14, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:06, 9 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete on the basis of no sources detectable at present. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:15, 9 October 2011 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger One ping only 00:50, 10 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - nearly unintelligable, bizzare dating system, no reliable sources. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:50, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: Bushranger, the dates in the article are in the "Hijri" calendar--Shirt58 (talk) 12:15, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah. I figured it was something like that. Still non-comprehensible to the majority of Wikipedia readers though. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:56, 11 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete No race of any sources. Disruptive editor creating nearly unintelligible stuff and then edit-warring about even simple maintenance tags (not just BLPPROD and AFD tags like here). --Crusio (talk) 07:36, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. This article is |en&u=http://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%AE%D8%B3%D8%B1%D9%88_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%AA%D8%B6%D8%AF a machine translation of the lead section of the Persian Wikipedia article. In that state it is pretty useless, and if anyone wants to create a proper translation they will still have the Persian article available if we delete ours. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:34, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: Notability not established, unsourced. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 12:42, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't appear to be notable, article would need a complete rewrite in any case. Because of the notability concerns, I don't see a way even to stub-salvage the article.  As an aside, dates should be provided using the standard Western calendar, though the local calendar dates may also be provided in the article, per WP:YEAR and WP:YEAR. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 03:55, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - seems to lack "significant coverage" in WP:RS as is therefore likely non-notable per WP:GNG. Anotherclown (talk) 08:26, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.