Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khudiadadzai


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was - kept

Khudiadadzai
fails Google test... therefore, must be made up. --Hemanshu 17:14, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not verifiable. [[User:David_Johnson|David Johnson [ T|C ] ]] 17:32, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Oh yes, pretty verifiable, with a bit of diligency. This article is yet one reason to keep speedy deletion policy in check. Mikkalai 18:04, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * keep, cleanup. It is from Pushtuns. No wonder fails google. Also, could be problem with English spelling. For example, Iranian "Khodadadi" family name sounds pretty close. I cleared some hintful links, but this is really not my area of expertise. Mikkalai 17:41, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, cleanup I think this article has a great potential, and further, I think could be quite valuble. Definatenly enyclopedic. Spinboy 20:26, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep for now, but this is the sort of thing where some citations would sure be useful. -- Jmabel | Talk 00:40, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep by all means, unless someone comes up with a better reason. There is absolutely no reason that an article on a minor Pashtun clan should be expected to be verifiable by Google, least of all by English-language Google.  I've submitted articles that couldn't be verified by Google myself sometimes, in sufficiently obscure topics; not all useful information has made it online yet.  However, I suspect the spelling is a bit unorthodox.  My guess is that it should be Khudadad Zai (ie Sons of Khudadad), but, since I don't speak Pashtun, I don't feel confident enough to move it. - Mustafaa 14:53, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep it for reasons listed above! &mdash;[[en:RaD Man|RaD Man (talk)]] 09:11, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.