Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khurshid Ali Khan (Singer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 10:18, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Khurshid Ali Khan (Singer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

BLPPROD removed by creator. Refs added are either to other Wikipedia pages or are unreliable. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:28, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Why this article is nominated for deletion if has references and this article is about a Renowned Ghazal Singer from India everybody know about him.1.23.49.153 (talk) 12:42, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * In this case, the article needs good sources preferably third-party such as news and magazine to ensure better sourcing. SwisterTwister   talk  06:40, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:24, 4 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as my searches found nothing to suggest improvement. SwisterTwister   talk  06:40, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

See this Times of India, I think nothing can be more trustworthy than TOI, what more you need for the reference? I think this article should be remain in wikipedia.1.23.50.213 (talk) 09:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * One source is not enough and, to be honest, although TOI is a good source, they're news articles aren't always good and reliable (searching there always gives random results). What this article needs is more third-party coverage. SwisterTwister   talk  18:17, 6 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: The only independent sources are a document proving that he used to be a vet, and a society-pages news article which mentions him along with about 10 other musicians in one paragraph. The general notability guideline requires in-depth coverage in multiple, reliable, independent sources. This article clearly fails this standard. --Slashme (talk) 22:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and SwisterTwister. Couldn't find anything on search engines to suggest they meet notability criteria.  Onel 5969  TT me 04:00, 9 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.