Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khurshid Ali Khan - Ghazal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:28, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Khurshid Ali Khan - Ghazal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable enough  Green Cricket   TALK  10:03, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Nordic   Dragon  10:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Nordic   Dragon  10:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

don't think that it should be deleted, it have sufficient number of references from reputed sources. 202.173.124.199 (talk) 13:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

He is well known singer of India and it have good number of references from well reputed sources like Times of India. so, i think this article should be kept as it is. Businefieds (talk) 15:46, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as the sources are not detailed enough, there's nothing to suggest better for the applicable music notability. SwisterTwister   talk  07:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Can you please explain what you mean by sources are not detailed enough? 202.173.125.176 (talk) 12:19, 1 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - not enough in-depth coverage in independent, reliable sources. The Times article is a regurgitated press release, and barely mentions this artist.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:57, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - not enough in-depth coverage in independent, reliable sources. The Times article is a regurgitated press release, and barely mentions this artist.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:57, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

and what about amar ujala article? 202.173.124.218 (talk) 07:04, 6 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.