Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kianna Dior (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:45, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Kianna Dior
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Utterly non notable. Fails GNG and ENT. Recreated from previous dele5tion but G4 refused, even though sourcing is still hopeless. Spartaz Humbug! 18:12, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:19, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:19, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:19, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Shellwood (talk) 18:23, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

In my opinion that actress has two awards. According to this fact, she deserves to be on Wikipedia. Moreover, she had to be such recognizable that she appeared in the Eminem's Video Clip to Without Me (Eminem song). Thought, Eminem's managers and movies selectioners didn't choose her to be starring in the Clip of such known and estimated rapperThe Wolak (talk) 14:03, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet our inclusion criteria for entertainers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:06, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Alas we need some policy basis for a vote and parts in videos and porn awards count for nothing. Spartaz Humbug! 15:54, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * However, I would have liked to pay attention that Kianna requires features of notability and requirements for entertainers. Regardless of number of votes being for or against deletion The Wolak (talk) 21:08, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry, that comment isn’t at all clear, is that an argument to keep or delete and what is the reasoning? Spartaz Humbug! 23:29, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I opt for remaining this article in wiki because that character seems to have any sings of notability The Wolak (talk) 15:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
 * please link the sings of notability? Do you mean sings or signs? Spartaz Humbug! 20:36, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
 * For example, gaining the most respectable award in porn industry such as AVN should be sufficient justification for her notability The Wolak (talk) 13:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The community rejected AVan wins as a notability standard when PORNBIO was deprecated. You need to find WP:GNG sources or show how she meets WP:ENTSpartaz Humbug! 15:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage of significance, does not meet notability standards Such-change47 (talk) 12:29, 19 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.