Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiarein


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. --Tito xd (?!?) 00:41, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Kiarein
vanity page, NN, is probably spam. Google has zero hits. Bachrach44 15:11, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. - Bachrach44 15:11, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. This brings neologisms to a new front. Ifnord 15:29, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Doesn't seem to be a speedy candidate, but definitely needs to be deleted. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 15:58, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete . Original work, vanity, non-notable, incoherent - no reason to let this live another day. DenisMoskowitz 16:42, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
 * On sober reflection it's not really speedy - but definitely delete. DenisMoskowitz 21:30, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I have removed nonsense. This article does not qualify as patent nonsense, a phrase which has a narrow meaning in Wikipedia policy. Please see WP:PN for more information. Please delete the page for contravention of WP:NOR. encephalon 
 * Delete per nom. Oyvind 10:00, 4 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.