Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kibaale Community Centre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Timotheus Canens (talk) 00:35, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Kibaale Community Centre

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources. Reference included in article is a primary source (funding agency for the center). Zero Google news hits and the Google web hits are either primary sources, blogs or largely adverts for donations for the centre. Not seeing how this might meet general notability guidelines RadioFan (talk) 14:17, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 22:48, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Changed to Keep: All high schools are notable. Joe Chill (talk) 01:22, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: notability not established with third-party reliable sources. --  李博杰   | —Talk contribs email 01:00, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. All schools are notable, and much of this organization's work is as a school, including an adult-education vocational school. I added http://www.newvision.co.ug/D/8/19/647675  as a reference. - Eastmain (talk) 22:03, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  - Eastmain (talk) 22:03, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions.  —Eastmain (talk) 22:06, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - quite clearly notable; not only contains a high school but an organisation that is pivotal in the community. Further, it is sponsored by several notable organisations and sources are available from which the page can be expanded. TerriersFan (talk) 22:34, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment While schools generally can be shown to be notable, they are not automatically notable (WP:SCHOOL did not pass). This article still must meet WP:GNG through references 3rd party sources which there dont seem to be much of.--RadioFan (talk) 00:02, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment The guideline WP:SCHOOL, you mentioned, is a failed proposal and does therefore not apply here.--Kmw2700 (talk) 03:09, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I cannot recall any documented secondary school being deleted as non notable in the last two years. We make the rules here as well as on policy pages (which are often at the mercy of filibusters), and this is one of the most consistent rules that is in practice followed, precisely in order to avoid wasting time on thousands of afs with essentially all of them passing.  Just as we assume elementary schools are not, to avoid thousands with all of them failing.    DGG ( talk ) 04:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - it has a high school with big local impact and is sponsered by notable organisations. --Kmw2700 (talk) 03:09, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I added another reference and removed redundant information. Adress of reference: --Kmw2700 (talk) 05:03, 5 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep All high schools are notable. Cunard (talk) 06:23, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * weak keep and possibly retitle. the  Kibaale Community Schools  would then be notable, not necessarily the rest of it. but perhaps an article emphasising the school can be written, free of the current promotional tone.    DGG ( talk ) 04:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have never seen a high school deleted from Wikipedia... not one that was readily verifiable at least.  JBsupreme (talk) 11:13, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.