Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kibow Biotech


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 23:13, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Kibow Biotech

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm not entirely sure if this is notable to Wiki standards and as my searches found nothing good here, here, here, here and here until I found Scholar results here. However, as I'm not familiar with this field, I hope a consensus can be made for this sparsely edited article from July 2009. SwisterTwister  talk  06:41, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:19, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:19, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:19, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:19, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. no evidence of notability, and considerable promotional content.  DGG ( talk ) 18:25, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:59, 4 September 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:58, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Biotech company of unclear notability. The refs provided cover papers by authors associated with the company and are not independent. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 04:49, 11 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.