Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kick Natural Energy Bar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:10, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Kick Natural Energy Bar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Given an exceptionally AGF straining and probably unwarranted benefit-of-the-doubt... this is... just obviously promotional garbage and needs to be deleted regardless of whether it is notable. Cheers. Timothy Joseph Wood 21:41, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:45, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: No independent sources. ToThAc (talk) 22:57, 8 September 2017 (UTC)


 * I guess I should clarify. What I mean is that this is exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with NOTFORPROMOTION. Timothy Joseph Wood  23:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:04, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:04, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Whoever tagged it for deletion does not know ethics of writing and uses insulting language. Article has been discussed before in Speedy deletion and there are independent confirmed sources. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasperna (talk • contribs) 00:37, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Similar articles without reliable cited sources do exist. For example, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A4rabar strictly promotional and from their own website. Compare articles please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moderatequite (talk • contribs) 00:44, 9 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Read WP:OTHERCRAP, please. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:34, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: The sources do establish notability. There is no advertisement established. Article is comprised of cited facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moderatequite (talk • contribs) 02:45, 9 September 2017 (UTC)  Please see Sockpuppet investigations/Jasperna
 * Delete -- 100% promotionalism on a company / product with no indications of notability or significance. The section on "Brand portfolio" contains all of the sub-brands, as in Kick Natural Energy Bar Cranberry. The red links apparently mean that the article's creator plan to add articles on all of them (?) Might as well raze the future walled garden to the ground now. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:54, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: I disagree. If there are red links that are bothering anyone from any article, they can be removed. I haven't noticed an extension to further product from this article. The fact that brand exists should remain not the red links, I agree. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasperna (talk • contribs) 23:08, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: Corrections seem to be made. To me doesn't look like a promotional intent if the corrections were made. Check for facts. Any boasting about the product if found to be removed(To the creator) thanks Ravinagr (talk) 03:44, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment -- I've stricken multiple sock "keep" votes; please see Sockpuppet investigations/Jasperna. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:18, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete insufficiently notable food product; WP:SPAM article. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:23, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * You... guys... really aren't picking up on these hints are you?  T J W  talk   01:37, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Purely promotional. And, to be sure, the article also fails general notability as the subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. I could find no mention of the product in the usual gSearches. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 18:06, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. No claims to WP:GNG. Ifnord (talk) 20:36, 13 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.