Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kidder Wachter Architecture and Design


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 02:51, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Kidder Wachter Architecture and Design

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

WP:NN company. Speedy declined by obvious sock/meatpuppet. Toddst1 (talk) 02:02, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, with a definite COI. ​​​​​​ ​​ Niagara ​​Don't give up the ship 03:12, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, still a possible speedy as db-corp. Hairhorn (talk) 04:49, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Something has to be done here, there are now several newly created accounts attempting to remove the deletion template for this article. 142.68.238.33 (talk) 00:33, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. Seems like nothing more than an attempt by a business owner to use wikipedia to promote or advertise his business. 142.68.238.33 (talk) 06:53, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete- non notable architectural firm, with ones just like it in every medium-sized town in the U.S. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 07:23, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions.  -- Bradjamesbrown (talk) 07:23, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability presented, probably COI. OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:19, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - definite WP:COI, creator is blocked for sockpuppeting, and most importantly it fails WP:CORP.  Cocytus   [»talk«]  04:57, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.