Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kidification


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Kidification

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to fail WP:NEO. Google searches don't seem to indicate more than the most superficial discussion in secondary sources. While the current content of the article is not slim, the connection of it to the word "kidification" seems to be original research. —Kodiologist (t) 21:07, 6 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:04, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:MADEUP. Blythwood (talk) 10:54, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTDIC. sst✈  05:40, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree that this seems to be made up.  At the very least, it's a neologism that hasn't caught on yet.  Searching Advertising Age and other marketing/advertising magazines turns up no relevant hits.  A Google Books search turns up what looks like unrelated trivial mentions.  Advertising to children certainly happens, but I don't think anyone calls it this.  This source, which is cited in the article, does not contain the word "kidification" according to Google Books. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:35, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as certainly questionable, not yet entirely convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  05:56, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.