Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KidsAlive Charity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  08:57, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

KidsAlive Charity

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An advertortorially-toned page on an unremarkable non-profit. Despite being 100+ years old, still does not meet WP:NORG; significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Created by [] with no other contributions outside this topic, and then edited by a variety of SPAs. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:51, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:03, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:03, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:03, 14 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment – Below is a search template using the organization's actual name, Kids Alive International . North America1000 02:09, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Primary source does not confirm notability. Reywas92Talk 02:25, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep seems to be a major charity in operation for a century and with annual income above £12m, readers would expect Wikipedia to cover it. Will look for sources later, cant access the NYI at present in Europe, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 17:11, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Szzuk (talk) 19:00, 21 September 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio Let's talk about it! 01:58, 29 September 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Still no consensus even after two relists

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg  jhp  jm  03:33, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment have found some significant coverage in reliable sources including this press,this press,this press, and this press so passes WP:GNG. Note: had to use VPN to access some of these from Europe, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 15:36, 11 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.