Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kids for Character


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Notability not established. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 07:32, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Kids for Character

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability or importance. Article has been tagged as unreferenced since 2011, and things do not seem to be getting any better. Also, the page has become a magnet for vandalism and hoaxes -      Electric  Burst (Electron firings)(Zaps) 16:11, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete There's no assertion of notability, and without references no justification for retaining article.TheLongTone (talk) 16:34, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - While being a magnet for vandalism is hardly a reason for deletion (or we'd hardly be able to have articles on anyone from Betsy Ross to George W. Bush), there are zero reliable sources for this. Yes, it seems to exist (I'll trust IMDb that far, at least) but there is virtually nothing else we can say about it. The cast currently shown, for example, is far less expansive than the anonymous IP SPAs would like us to show, but is far more expansive than IMDb indicates. IMDb reports it won the "Parents' Choice Gold Award" which might be a "major award", if this is referring to the same award, but the website for Parents' choice seems to be unaware of this video. While there are several routes to argue for the presumption of notability here, the complete lack of reliable sources trump them all. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 02:11, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as searches simply found nothing better. SwisterTwister   talk  04:58, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable enough to be included in an encyclopedia. &mdash; Music1201  talk  01:25, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Philafrenzy (talk) 08:40, 4 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.