Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kidult


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete - per WP:NOTDIC - specifically this section which states the key differences between  encyclopedic and dictionary coverage of a topic. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 12:21, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Kidult

 * – ( View AfD View log  •   )

Article fails WP:GNG. It has lacked significant coverage and secondary sources for over 2 decades, the only article used as a citation is the only source of information on the subject, and everything in the article appears to be original research and unencyclopedic in nature. Secobi (talk) 11:48, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 22 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Puer aeternus, looks like a plausible synonym.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:33, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Σ  τ  c . 06:03, 7 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak keep: There are a few mentions of the term and its use on web, some of them reliable. Looks like the article has been considered for deletion before and its history shows considerable edits. I'd say keep the article after expansion. Samar  ( Talk  .  Contributions ) 12:48, 7 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: atleast two sources are present in the article. More should can be probably found. Based on that, deleting might not be really constructive given that others can further source it later. -- lTopGunl (talk) 18:08, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTDICT. Ignoring refs to the French graffiti artist of this name, I found Mature children: an oxymoron? which seems to be at odds with the content of the current article. We're not a dictionary. -- Trevj (talk) 11:51, 17 May 2012 (UTC)