Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kierkan Rufo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. No reliable sources provided to establish notability. Mr.  Z- man  04:38, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Kierkan Rufo

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable fictional character. prod removed without comment by User:71.108.52.19, so listing at AfD. Mikeblas 06:10, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - see other Forgotten Realms nominations TaintedZebra 11:22, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unreferenced, in-universe style, fails WP:N. Edison 13:05, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to The Cleric Quintet, which needs work and would be enhanced with a characters section including a shortened version of this. Pinball22 14:39, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment &mdash; Already mentioned on the page for the much more notable Cadderly Bonaduce character. Doesn't appear to be a major/notable character in his own right, within the context of this setting. No support for keep. &mdash; RJH (talk) 15:30, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletions.   —Quasirandom 15:58, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep as per TaintedZebra. Need to be reorganised, re-written if need be, and categorized correctly. scope_creep 16:04, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks notability, no reliable secondary sources Pilotbob 23:18, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, violates WP:NOT and unlikely reliable secondary sources can be found to establish notability per WP:FICT. Doctorfluffy 19:12, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletions.   --Gavin Collins 17:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as there are no primary or secondary sources, just plotsummary. The only ghits come from fansites. --Gavin Collins 17:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * delete per RJH or merge per Pinball22. If The Cleric Quintet is notable enough to satisfy WP:BK, then perhaps the characters should be discussed within the context of the book article (also adding content to the article). If, however, the book itself doesn't satisfy its category's notability guideline, then delete. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 01:58, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.