Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kijong-dong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Procedural close. Redirects for discussion is the appropriate place for this discussion. —Tom Morris (talk) 23:31, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Kijong-dong

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am also nominating the following related pages because of the same cases:

The letter ŏ, ŭ is not used in article titles per WP:NC-KO. For example Pyongyang is correct, not P'yŏngyang. The pages to be moved to these names are Kijŏng-dong, Samjiyŏn, and Unhŭng. Sawol (talk) 21:40, 3 December 2012 (UTC) 
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 December 3.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  22:05, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect all as suitable spelling errors on an english keyboard Seasider91 (talk) 22:49, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Query, is there any reason you can't simply move the three pages to the non-diacritic titles? Chris857 (talk) 23:18, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I make a lot of effort to move Kijŏng-dong to Kijong-dong. See the page history.  One admin declined my speedy deletion request.  User talk:Nyttend.  I moved page Hŭngnam to Hungnam, Ŏjŏk-tong to Ojok-tong, Kimhyŏngjik to Kimhyongjik, thanks to other admins' help.  Sawol (talk) 07:11, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment since these are redirects now; this discussion should be at WP:RFD. If it isn't moved; the redirects seem fine to me as plausible typing without diacritics and should be kept. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 20:43, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. The article titles probably should be renamed to titles without diacritics. However, this is not the place to discuss article moves and until they are moved the redirects certainly should not be deleted. Take the discussion to WP:RM and follow the instructions there. -- Necrothesp (talk) 23:30, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  talk to me! 10:12, 10 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Close this AfD. As stated above, this is an issue for WP:RFD. 1292simon (talk) 01:01, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.