Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiki (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Per the discussion herein, I added the Cleanup AfD template atop the article. North America1000 07:31, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Kiki (album)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Most sources on page are primaries (Only four aren't, but one of those is another WP article so that's no good either). I think there may be enough reliable non-primary sources available to still make something worthwhile out of this, including at least one or two that aren't already present which I saw on Google, but I'd like to see the article draftified first to be certain. As is, this article is definitely not up to snuff. QuietHere (talk) 07:40, 5 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:28, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. QuietHere (talk) 07:40, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  07:08, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, album seems to have charted but I couldn't find any reputable reviews (just questionable blogs) and the current sourcing is atrocious. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:32, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: Only the last 2 sources in the article are reliable since it talks about the EP. The rest are primary sources. I also found some reliable sources which talk about the album:, , , and . That said, the article is good enough to pass WP:NALBUM.  ASTIG️🙃  (ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 15:14, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Those were the sources I saw in my search that led me to suggest draftifying rather than outright deleting. A lot of the article may need to be torn down in removing all the primaries which will be quite the process, but I will second that it passes notability given the links you've provided. And perhaps the article doesn't actually need to be draftified in order to do all that work, but either way a big change is needed. QuietHere (talk) 04:34, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep Meets WP:NALBUM with sources presented by Astig. I agree with the nom that it needs to be trimmed down. SBKSPP (talk) 01:20, 21 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.