Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiki Valentine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 18:11, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Kiki Valentine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG/WP:ARTIST. Largely written by a (near) SPA who has, i suspect, a close connection to the articles subject, since Kiki Valentine features prominently in a blog with the same name as the main contributor. Promotional tone, unsourced claims, namedropping. Kleuske (talk) 07:59, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:54, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:54, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:54, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:25, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:04, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah, what Kleuske said. Not notable, and we are not a political forum. Delete. Drmies (talk) 15:03, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep This page should not be deleted. It is relevant that a public figure and civilian is now a matter of international discussion and is setting a precedent in Federal Court regarding a non-partisan issue that affects the interpretation of the Constitution and Amendments as well as over 200 million Americans. Kristine4president (talk) 15:26, 11 October 2018 (UTC) kristine4president https://www.natlawreview.com/article/test-could-presidential-text-message-alert-system-be-violation-privacy-rights
 * I do not see Kiki Valentine or Kristine Rakowsky mentioned anywhere in that source. Would you care to point out what I missed? Kleuske (talk) 09:28, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:ANYBIO, and the lawsuit merely makes her a WP:BLP1E.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:30, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * revisiting. local political activist with a little coverage in local media.  note that in the NYTimes story on getting space set aside for breastfeeding in city hall, she appears only a poster child, well, poster mommy at the news conference, which is in the local news section of the Times.  fails WP:SIGCOV.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:17, 18 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Note that User:Kristine4president is sort of a SPA. She has made only 198 edits in 7 years. Her 2nd edit created this page.  It was immediately prodded.  She created 60% of the content on the page, and almost all the rest was added by a  series of IP accounts in Brooklyn, where Kiki Valentine lives.  Delete as WP:PROMO for a non-notable individual.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:23, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete. I didn't do any searching on my own (hence the weak modifier), but looking at the sources in the article, this fails WP:NBIO.  The DNAInfo, Daily News, and NY Times articles are all about causes she's been involved in, and mention her name, but they're not actually about her.  The Politico, Nat Law Review, and Courthouse News pieces don't even mention her.  -- RoySmith (talk) 14:39, 18 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.