Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kikin Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:23, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Kikin Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nothing that distinguishes this webware app provider from the tens of thousands of other; i.e., fails WP:GNG; moreover, it is written less like an encyclopedic article than a promotional piece, most likely written by someone with a WP:COI, so if kept it would likely have to be entirely re-written solely from sources that are reliable, rather than employee linked in profiles as now. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 02:06, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 10:45, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 10:46, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 10:46, 6 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails GNG, and just over the cusp into blatant advertising. Coretheapple (talk) 15:40, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.