Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killa Tay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 07:33, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Killa Tay

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable musician, can't find anything more than track lists and name drops. Doesn't appear to meet MUSICBIO or GNG. Note: I originally overlooked the discography, so I've added it to this AfD. Primefac (talk) 22:31, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, all cited sources are directories and fail to establish that the subject passes our inclusion criteria. Guy (Help!) 22:56, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete both Does not meet WP:MUSICBIO at this time, and discography articles are intended for notable artists.  Mini  apolis  00:40, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete While the Allmusic and Billboard cites on Killa Tay are more than directory entries, they are barely above the passing mention level. Moreover they are signed by the same person and look to be nearly identical, so they aren't truly "multiple sources". DES (talk) 01:31, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 12 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as this seems to be another case of no obvious signs of improvement. SwisterTwister   talk  04:24, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. It seems cruel to pile-on, but there's really no significant coverage in reliable source that I can find.  There are scattered hits throughout Google Books, but they're always one-line mentions.  Maybe there's more offline coverage that we can't access.  If so, then the article can be recreated (with better sourcing).  I wasn't going to comment on this AfD, as it seems to have come about from a request for help against vandalism on ANI, but, really, there's no other outcome that I can see. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:29, 15 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.