Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killara High School

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep. Scimitar 4 July 2005 22:09 (UTC)

Killara High School
Marked for speedy but isn't a candidate. Reason given was "orphan vanity". Article does not establish the notability of this school.  &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 02:44, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * keep A high school is in and of it's self noteable. Could be expanded Billhpike 03:09, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Pburka 04:37, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. DS1953 05:12, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep verifiable and NPOV schools. Double Blue  (Talk) 05:29, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Billhpike. Kappa 06:24, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Elliott C. Bäck 06:33, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article fails to establish notability. --Carnildo 07:13, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. -ÅfÇ++ 08:06, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Once you remove this unsourced POV statement (it's not POV as suggested above. "Killara has a strong reputation in academic achievement, music, dance, sport, debating and strong participation in the Duke of Edinburgh Scheme.", there's really not much of an article left. Could all those keep voters, please include reasons regarding the article, instead of it being a school? - Mgm|(talk) 09:48, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Only two keep votes mentioned that it's a school, and both of them explained why they consider that to be a good reason. DoubleBlue further provided some very interesting links on the matter. Personally, I think we should keep this article because it's informative, easily expandable, and useful to people.  I don't see any drawbacks to keeping it &mdash; do you? Factitious 12:00, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * See also Schools/Arguments. Kappa 14:35, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * While I agree that it should be better referenced directly as a source, the external links do verify the statements in the article. For example, see Killara news page particularly the last two items: Premier's Awards for All Round Excellence and HSC RESULTS 2004. If you think it is poorly referenced, I suggest adding an appropriate tag like   or editing it.  Double Blue  (Talk) 15:38, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Very good stub. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 11:13, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Accurate, expandable, verifiable, encyclopedic.  Imagine if all stubs were up to those standards. Factitious 12:00, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Stub it, and hope somebody affiliated with it sees it and expands it. --Zpb52 15:59, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, good stub. Christopher Parham (talk) 16:49, 2005 Jun 26 (UTC)
 * Keep How about the deletionists give a reason other than it being a stub and alleged lack of notability, neither of which is a valid reason for deletion? CalJW 18:21, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep a good stub to work on.--Bhadani 18:59, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I've de-orphaned.  &#08492; astique &#09660; talk 00:29, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep &mdash; Educating 3-400 students per year for 26 years. That's almost a small city. &mdash; RJH 03:33, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 28 June 2005 07:54 (UTC)
 * Strong delete not notable. Dunc|&#9786; 28 June 2005 08:59 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable school. Klonimus 28 June 2005 18:36 (UTC)
 * Keep good stub, inherently notable.  Un focused 29 June 2005 00:36 (UTC)
 * Merge into Killara. This school is not notable, but fits nicely into the town's page -Harmil 30 June 2005 02:26 (UTC)
 * Merge into Killara, per Harmil. --Idont Havaname 1 July 2005 08:02 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.