Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killer Holiday


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I will userfy as requested JohnCD (talk) 22:55, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Killer Holiday

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable film, no notable people, yet to be released. My speedy deletion tag was removed. Corvus cornix talk  18:28, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find any significant coverage for this film. Only the film's star, Micahel Copon, seems to be relevent, but I think this is a case of WP:TOOSOON. Maybe once the film is actually finished it will receive some coverage in reliable sources (no, that doesn't include YouTube). Angryapathy (talk) 18:49, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON. While even willing to grant the interview clips on youtube indicate it is beginning to get some "buzz", and that the mention last October by Leslie Holtzman of The Independent speaks toward its casting, and that NME even shares a trailer, there is still not enough coverage available for this one to merit an independent article.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:28, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep The page has been significantly updated with additional media coverage and news links to the celebrities involved. There has been buzz about the film in the media this week as the creative team is at Sundance Film Festival, and especially about Michael Copon. 12:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.185.229.148 (talk • contribs) ( commented originally signed by IP as "SuzieQHoliday" )
 * Really all you've provided is that Michael Copon is notable, which isn't what this debate is about. The links you have provided still do not constitute reliable sources. Angryapathy (talk) 20:25, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


 *  Keep  I'm confused by your response, Angryapathy. You don't consider Entertainment Tonight, the New York Daily News, USA Today, or The Independent to be reliable sources for a movie entry on wikipedia? 4:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SuzieQHoliday (talk • contribs)
 * To SuzieQHoliday, Be sure to "sign with 4 " ~ ". There's only one "keep" per customer - even if not signed in when commenting, and please do not remove the links showing you were the one making the comments.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:40, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * And also, please understand that while your sources DO show the film is in production... that is really not the issue. What IS the issue is the depth and endurance of coverage. Please see WP:NFF.  For an unreleased or incomplete film to even be considered for inclusion, the coverage has to be much greater than what is currently available.  Heck, this one is not even listed yet on IMDB.  I advise you request the article be userfied to you at User:SuzieQHoliday/workspace/Killer Holiday for continued work and improvement. I'd even be glad to advise on article format, style, and source suitability, in working toward its eventual return. But with all respects, this article is simply premature.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:25, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you, MichaelQSchmidt. How do I request the article be userfied to me at that link? SuzieQHoliday (talk) 01:04, 28 January 2011 (UTC)SuzieQHoliday
 * When this AFD is closed, simply make the request of the closer on his talk page... or drop me a note at User talk:MichaelQSchmidt and I will ask that it be done for you.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:01, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * In response, The New York Daily News and USA Today articles don't even mention the movie, and The Independant basically mentions the title of the movie. Again, proving the notability of Michael Copon isn't the same as proving the notability of the article topic. Angryapathy (talk) 21:49, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * And having the author work on it in a sandbox will get it off of mainspace and allow editing skills to be better learned.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 09:15, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.