Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killer Instinct 3


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-08 22:24Z 

Killer Instinct 3

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Well if this isn't WP:CRYSTAL, I don't know what is. Full of lovely comments such as "It's no secret that fans want a sequel, and Rare knows this." As it is, it's nothing but a rumor. Only if and when Rare officially annouces that they're working on a Killer Instinct 3 should this article be made. SeizureDog 17:17, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Also full of weasel words, e.g. "many speculate that..." Walton monarchist89 17:23, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. May deserve an article if/when it's release is announced, but not at the moment. -- Scot t  17:43, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete definitely a campaign for a sequel to a decade old game, full of rampant speculation ˉˉanetode╦╩ 19:15, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * ULTRA DELETE!!!! crystalballism (and after the poochscrew that was KI2, I don't want another sequel). JuJube 01:22, 5 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Not Delete Stop this damnit, there is more than enough RELIABLE sources that have reported about this being a rumor, WTF is wrong with people, why cant a page exist if there is more than enough talk about the subject at hand, this isnt me speculating or wishing it will happen, its reporting on the rumor that is Killer Instinct 3 also since when is personal dislike a reason to wanna delete it, who the hell cares if you didnt like KI2 THAT DOESNT MATTER also this exists on Killer Instinct 2's page but it briefly explains the situation, how is this any different except for it being an elaboration on its own page? I am getting very frustrated with Wikipedians. oh and I suppose by these standards Silent Hill 5 should be deleted too'''PseudoKirby 12:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter if you have sources. An "official" rumor is still just a rumor.--SeizureDog 00:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment. I'd like to point you to WP:INN. Oh, and the fact that SH5 is actually in development, backed up by an interview with its chief designer. The KI3 page, on the other hand, is pure speculation. Shrumster 13:56, 5 February 2007 (UTC)


 * No SH5 IS NOT confirmed, its still just a rumor and hearsay by the developers, no more than the hints and teases that Rare has given on KI3, if you wanna talk speculation and only posting things that are official, SH5 is FAR from official, and thats all that should be posted then PseudoKirby 03:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * From Famitsu: FM: We have missed the Tokyo Game show chance to see Silent Hill 5 trailer, will we see any new informations on it next? Akira: I cannot say when or where we will make the idea public but it is in production.--SeizureDog 12:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.