Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killing Day


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:39, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Killing Day

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Missed that a previous PROD had already occurred. So the back story: This article was PROD'd in 2016, which was removed on grounds that instead a merger discussion was happening at Talk:List_of_Ubisoft_games. That elicited a single oppose on the grounds that a non-notable topic should just be deleted, not merged. So the PROD->Merge fizzled.

If you go searching, you're going to find three sets of sporadic coverage. It's announcement at E3, that it was apparently cancelled about a year later, and random "Ubisoft renewed it's trademarks." There's no significant in-depth coverage of the game though, and since it's apparent cancellation, Ubisoft does not appear to have made any announcements or statements, simply renewed their trademarks routinely.

With nothing else to say, I believe this cancelled game fails to be notable. -- ferret (talk) 17:22, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. -- ferret (talk) 17:22, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:24, 20 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. – The Grid  ( talk )  18:32, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. It got a small flurry of coverage, but nothing indicating significant coverage as only a small bit of the game was ever shown.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:53, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Appears in some sources, but mostly WP:RUNOFTHEMILL with many sources copying each other in reporting stuff like trademark filings. I found no significant coverage. IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 19:46, 27 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.