Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kilominx


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  21:04, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Kilominx

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Puzzle which has not received significant coverage from multiple reliable independent secondary sources Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:22, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose. With a few secondary references added, this article will be as valid as any other. I've added two more references this morning from the Twisty Puzzles Museum; if you find more please feel free to add them. Skewb? (talk) 06:42, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Keep per Skewb? . WizardKing 00:04, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:52, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:31, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Coverage is very bad. twistypuzzles website also has a shop selling similar products, so it's a clear COI. ruwix.com is a wiki, so a self-publisher site it's not reliable. And then there's what effectively looks like someone's personal Web 1.0 page from the 90s. No, those sources don't cut it by any stretch. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:41, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The twistypuzzles.com shop is operated separately from the museum. Saying it's not a reliable source because it also includes a shop is like saying a music group's official website is not a reliable source for its article, just because it has a merch store. With ruwix.com I admit I have to agree. Jaap's is a perfectly fine source if you ignore the poor quality of the page. Skewb? (talk) 13:18, 2 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Sources in the article aren't reliable. w umbolo   ^^^  14:27, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG.  I can't find any WP:RS.  Lots of search results, but they're all vendors who sell these things, blogs or other WP:UGC, or niche sources which fail WP:AUD.  -- RoySmith (talk) 13:12, 11 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.