Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kilvey Killer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Kilvey Hill.  Sandstein  19:33, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Kilvey Killer

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fund-raising sport event. Fails WP:GNG. No significant coverage. Night of the Big Wind talk  21:23, 14 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge to Kilvey Hill. Coverage about this race exists over a period of time, but is strictly local (see, , ,  all from This is South Wales).  This suggests that there is insufficient notability to sustain a standalone article, but verifiable information can be selectively merged to the Kilvey Hill article. -- Whpq (talk) 14:15, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 18:22, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 18:22, 16 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge to Kilvey Hill, which is usually the best outcome for events with slight coverage and borderline notability. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 00:14, 17 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Retain This article satisfies the No Original Research Test because it is attributable to a reliable published source. This article satisfies the No Significant Coverage Test because sources address the subject directly in detail, so no original research is needed to extract the content. In addition the significant coverage is more than trivial because the subject is the main topic of the source material in more than one article. The assertion for deletion or merger is therefore not proven and the article is valid as a stand alone article. User:Vouliagmeni (talk)00:30, 23 March 2012 (CET)
 * Yes, there are four articles from the same local paper that are about the event. The question is whether four articles from the same local paper qualifies as significant coverage. (The other two sources appear to be dead links - the one linking to a forum definitely doesn't count towards notability.) You do, the nominator doesn't, and that is what this AfD is for: to decide whose interpretation the community agrees with. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 07:46, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge to Kilvey Hill. Locally known and appears to have local significance, but insufficient coverage to satisfy GNG as all citations that I can view are to Thisissouthwales.co.uk. The Runner World link is dead, and appears to have been a user's forum in any event, which would not qualify as a reliable source. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  16:29, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.