Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Cloutier (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:43, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Kim Cloutier
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable model. Some covers, some works, just that. damiens.rf 16:13, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:10, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:10, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:11, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:11, 30 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep As I stated in Articles for deletion/Kim Cloutier (2nd nomination), I support the arguments presented there that she has achieved a significant level of notability. I.E.,  noted that she has established international notability in her profession based on a diverse set of print media works from around the globe.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 02:15, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per the exact same reasons as on the previous AfD. Additionally, this repeated AfD of this article with copy/pasted rationale by Damiens.rf is becoming disruptive and needs to stop. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 02:38, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Was and is notable per WP:SIGCOV. gidonb (talk) 05:06, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet the notability guidelines for models.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:15, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Nothing has changed since the last AfD which has established notability. f eminist 10:28, 5 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.