Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Hong-kyun


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. SIGCOV met. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:30, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Kim Hong-kyun

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:BIO. None of the sources are of any use in establishing notability, nor is his position. (Kim Hong-kyun (rower) should be moved here afterward.) Clarityfiend (talk) 20:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 02:04, 25 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   20:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:24, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:24, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment. The article you mentioned about the rower is exactly the type of article that ends up not being kept in discussions these days. Geschichte (talk) 21:07, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Plenty of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources (A profile of him in Yonhap, coverage of his visit to Germany in Yonhap, coverage of his appointment to the Korean Peninsula Peace position in Yonhap), something to be expected for someone who was previously also a high level diplomat (South Korean ambassador to Germany since October 2022). I will say the article is outdated since it hasn't been updated since 2017. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 14:01, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. F4U provided I think enough reasonable sources. toobigtokale (talk) 19:26, 6 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep per the sources found by F4U. Eluchil404 (talk) 01:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.